Wednesday, September 10, 2008

York on the IMB and NPR

I am just now returning from a historic meeting of the International Mission Board. President Jerry Rankin, Chairman Paul Chitwood, staff, trustees, and a special task force are working closely together, perhaps more than ever before, to chart the course for a bold missiological paradigm shift that will propel us to greater efforts at world evangelization. Following Dr. Rankin's lead, the task force presented to the trustees a statement of vision, mission, and core values. After evaluation, discussion, tweaking, and the presentation of a final form, the Board unanimously approved the following:

VISION

Our vision is a multitude from every language, people, tribe and nation knowing and worshipping our Lord Jesus Christ.

MISSION

Our mission is to make disciples of all peoples in fulfillment of the Great Commission.

CORE VALUES

1. We commit to obedience to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and to God’s inerrant Word.

2. We believe Jesus Christ is God’s only provision for salvation and all people without personal faith in Him are lost and will spend eternity in hell.

3. We seek to provide all people an opportunity to hear, understand and respond to the gospel in their own cultural context.

4. We evangelize through proclamation, discipling, equipping and ministry that results in indigenous reproducing Baptist churches.

5. We serve churches to facilitate their involvement in the Great Commission and the sending of missionaries to bring all peoples to faith in Jesus Christ.

6. We partner with Baptists and other Christians around the world in accordance with IMB guidelines.

7. We understand and fulfill God’s mission through God’s Word, prayer and the leadership of the Holy Spirit.


Based on this vision, mission, and core values, we also approved 8 proposals for revisioning what the IMB of the future must look like and the parameters for reaching a lost world that is less and less defined by national boundaries. The 8 proposals are:

Revisioning 2008 Proposals

1. We affirm a continuing commitment to the basic priority of impacting lostness through:
• Evangelism, discipleship and planting reproducing churches.
• Engagement of all peoples with the gospel.
• Comprehensive, holistic strategies including but not limited to medical, media, human needs, social ministries, training and theological education.

2. We affirm a commitment to serve and facilitate all cooperating Southern Baptists involved in fulfilling our Great Commission task.

3. We affirm the creation and the expanded utilization of platform organizations for creative access to impact lostness.

4. We affirm appropriate levels of cooperation with others, including:
• Indigenous Baptist partners and missionaries;
• Non-IMB Southern Baptists engaged in overseas missions;
• Great Commission partners.

5. We affirm a revision of our vision and mission statements and core values to reflect a more relevant expression of our current task and commitments.

6. We affirm an organizational structure based on the following principles:
• Maximize frontline personnel in witness and church planting.
• Minimize administrative field structure and resources.
• Serve and facilitate field personnel and their needs.
• Provide appropriate accountability at all levels.
• Provide a seamless unity between home and the field.
• Alleviate administrative burden of the regions.
• Accommodate supervision and accountability of creative access platform organizations.
• Staffed by servant leadership at all levels.


7. We affirm a uniform structure in which missionary personnel are assigned to a team whose work is coordinated by a team facilitator.
• Teams are organized into clusters led by a cluster leader to facilitate impacting the lostness of their assigned target area/people group/s.
• Clusters are affiliated with global affinity groups.
• Global affinity groups are established on the basis of language, culture and ethnicity.
• Affinity group strategists ensure accountability of the clusters to the Office of Global Strategy.

8. Each missionary unit is served by geographically-based support teams representing financial management, business services, personnel support and mobilization assistance.


These are exciting days as Southern Baptists probe the edges of lostness. Though I have only been on the board for one year, I sense a new day in partnership between missionaries, staff, and trustees. A spirit of focused purpose, cooperation, and harmony for the gospel's sake permeated our meeting. Debate and disagreement was respectful, insightful, and even helpful. The result was evident in the recommitment to and recasting of our vision. Furthermore we took some positive steps to show greater trust in our Richmond staff as they work with missionary candidates and present them to the Board. I was gratified to be a small part of that effort by serving on a subcommittee that was charged with reviewing the way we deal with and present candidates. I don't think I am overstating it one bit to say the staff was elated with the results of our efforts.

The next four months will be critical in the future of world evangelization, not just in the life of the IMB. As the largest missionary sending agency in the world, the IMB necessarily sets the pace for other agencies who feel the ripples of what we do. Please pray for the task force, Dr. Rankin, Dr. Chitwood, the staff, and the board as we work through and implement the implications of our vision, mission, and core values that God has given us.

Finally and on a completely different note, I will appear on National Public Radio's Tell Me More on Friday, September 12, and the topic will be the evangelical faith of Gov. Sarah Palin. The media have had a field day talking about her church's views on homosexuality, creation, and even the second coming of Christ. What is fair game in a political race? The show does not appear in all markets, but you can listen to it online at the preceding link or on Sirius satellite radio on channel 134 at 9AM or 6PM.

20 comments:

Brent Hobbs said...

Dr. York,
Thank you for the update and information. I'm glad to hear about the work going on and the continuing focus to make sure we are as effective as possible in our missions work.

shadrach said...

Good commentary on the meeting. I doubt this will change much in WA, but other parts of the world may be more drastically affected.

As one in the career appointment process, are there changes to the way appointment is done that I should know about?

Justa Believer said...

"impacting lostness"?

"probe the edges of lostness"?

What is that -- missio-speak?

Anonymous said...

Dr. York:

Thank you for this report regarding the IMB meeting. I am glad to hear that things are going so well. Thanks to you and the other board members for their service.

Louis

Camel Rider said...

It's interesting that we're hearing more about the changes from outside than we are from inside.

What does all of this mean? How will this change our focus on ministry? How will this change our leadership structure? Will all of this be decided prior to unveiling or is that what will evolve afterwards?

Anonymous said...

Camel Rider has a good point and good questions. It has been a week since the meeting ended and we are having to read outside sources to learn about the "changes". Hopefully some of these and other questions will be answered soon.

Hershael W York said...

Camel: First of all, feel free to email me if you want to talk in more detail. Frankly, what this direction will look like in terms of structure and support is going to be fleshed out over the next four months. Frankly, we know what we want to produce and achieve more than we yet know precisely how to get there. Many decisions are yet to be made, and frankly most of those decisions are at the level of senior staff, not the board. The board sets policy, and the staff implements that policy. So though it might feel a bit confusing and even frightening for you guys on the field, I truly think the vast majority of our m's are going to like this and feel a greater freedom and empowerment than ever before. The structure above you is unquestionably going to change because we will now organize by affinity groups rather than geographical regions, but on the field I think the results will be well worth it. I wish I could tell you more, but I can't--not because its a secret but because it is far from being finalized.

You may know Dr. David Sills, my colleague at Southern and a former m with the IMB. Find his take on it at http://davidsills.blogspot.com/2008/09/world-on-our-minds.html.

shadrach said...

J. Believer,

Yeah, it is missio-speak, does it not make sense?

What are you supposed to do about lostness?

Basically it is a good turn-of-phrase that gets the people involved excited. Would you not be glad to have it said of you that you are 'impacting lostness' in your community?

shadrach said...

Camel and Anon,

I know at least a few (and I am assuming all) regional leaders received an email outlining these changes. Our leader chose to forward that on to all of us. If your situation allows, you might inquire of your leader if you did not receive that email.

Also, you might check the Board blog. Everything is posted there (in comments) and it will be the main source of information dissemination.

Tom Parker said...

shadrach:

How do the words get the people involved excited?

shadrach said...

Tom, you sound skeptical. Let me ask you a question: If you're a football fan, how do you feel if someone yells 'touchdown' in your team's game? If you're a soccer fan, how do you feel if someone screams 'goal' when your team is playing?

So in the missions game, if someone were to say about you that you are 'impacting lostness,' would that not get you excited?

Tom Parker said...

shadrach:

I'm not sure how 9 words penned by me makes me sound skeptical to you. I however, see your point and thank you for helping me to view this matter differently. I can now see how these words could bring about excitement.

Justa Believer said...

Shadrach,
Thanks for your insights. I suppose the phrase "impacting lostness" makes sense somewhat, but it's a bit ambiguous and indirect for my tastes. I consider "lostness" something only God can truly "impact" (and He does a lot more than just impact it, He permanently eliminates it in the lives of believers), but I know He uses us to get the Word out. I'm personally not big on chichi sounding phrases, but I'm happy if it helps you or others get excited about spreading the gospel.

Kevin M. Crowder said...

Dr. York,

Could you answer the following two question regarding the present spirit of the IMB BoT's?

1. Did the resignation of Wade Burleson positively or negatively impact the spirit of cooperation on the board?

2. Did the recent resignation of Jerry Corbaley from the IMB BoT's have any impact whatsoever on the spirit of cooperation at this recent meeting and is the IMB "one step closer to overturning the two ‘doctrinal’ policies that have ripped the thread of cooperation from the fabric of Southern Baptist cooperative missions." -WB?

I am encouraged by your post and believe that the Spirit can do great and wonderful things when men of God pray. But neither your blog nor WB's recent gloating seems to address how the board itself is doing. I think the approved restructuring plan sounds great, but I am not certain this has anything to do with Burleson, Corbaley, or any one in particular. Are we heading in the right direction despite the disagreements of the past? Because that sounds to me like a God thing and not the fulfillment of the Burleson Doctrine.

Thank you,

Kevin M. Crowder

Hershael W York said...

Kevin:

I am really not qualified to say how any one trustee's absence might impact the board either positively or negatively, so I am going to refrain from addressing either of your questions regarding personalities on the board. For one thing, since I am still new on the board and wasn't really there for so much of the tension in the past, I don't have a sense of what it was versus what it is.

What I can tell you is this: the trustees are really together. I sensed nothing other than unity of purpose and a willingness to get the gospel to all peoples.

As far as the two doctrinal parameters you asked about, I do not remember them even coming up at this meeting.

Finally, I think my blog does say how the board is doing. Unanimous votes mean something. I noted that the debate and discussion we had was respectful and helpful. In other words, we went through discussion, debate, suggestions, tweaking, and we arrived at a unanimous decision. I think that is a good sign of health.

I can also say I truly like all of my fellow trustees, at least as much as I know them. I am confident that I disagree with some of them on certain issues, but that never gets personal. One trustee petitioned our Mission Personnel Committee to implement one particular change, which we declined to do, and he made it clear that he would respect our decision--and he did.

That's the way it ought to be. I could not feel more positive about the board and the direction we are heading.

Kevin M. Crowder said...

Thank you. I am encouraged as well. I am especially encouraged that a broader methodology will be implemented allowing the missionaries to truly follow the leading and guiding of the Holy Spirit. I have been saying and fearing for months that I am afraid that the IMB would have likely said NO to the man from Macedonia. I am hopeful that this "New Approach" will honor the Lord and create an environment where SBC churches will feel proud to give to the CP and LMCO and where missionaries can perform their calling biblically.
As to the 2 doctrinal guidelines: I support them, but was curious as to the report over at the "WB Network" that their overturning was one step closer with the resignation of Corbaley.
I thank you for your response and bid you a happy and joyous Lord's Day.

K

shadrach said...

I also am not pleased by Wade B's "ownership" of these changes, but it's at least one post where he is not attacking someone's integrity.

Dr. York, seeing you live out the passion and truth of your text has made me more appreciative and understanding of the things you write. Before, I might have charged you with being evasive. =) Not now.

Tom Parker said...

shadrach:

Personally I find your comment about Wade B. an attack on his integrity. You can do better than that.

shadrach said...

Tom,

I don't say anything here that I don't say to Wade himself.

I don't interact on Wade's blog much anymore mostly due to the fact that he is always attacking someone these days. If you didn't notice, even in wishing Corbaley well, he was attacking him.

In talking about the problem with pastor-sex offenders, he was attacking Patterson (maybe rightly so).

That's just the way he rolls. Call a spade a spade.

Tom Parker said...

shadrach:

Thanks for your thoughtful response to me. I look forward to our future dialogue.